Thursday, November 21, 2013

Heather Martin's Big Lies: A Cornucopia of Pseudo-Intellectual Red Neck Trailer Trash

I was going to go through Heather Martin’s cyberharrassment blog which exists for the sole purpose of libeling Kevin Annett and anyone (like myself) who associates with him. My intent was to try to address some of her wild-eyed rants against Kevin Annett seriously.


Unfortunately it’s such a bizarre hodge-podge of what can only be described loosely as ‘content’,  reflecting an irrational and delusional rage hate paradigm filled with venomous false accusations, deceptions based on numerous logical fallacies, and misinformation, that I didn’t know where to begin.


All I can say is that I simply ended up aghast at the type of mind that could confabulate such complete nonsense with such apparent ease.


No doubt that the brain dead sheeple will get conned by this piece of trash. After all, 50% of the population is below average intelligence but anyone who actually does have both sides of their brain working (as Heather herself puts it) won’t buy into Heather Martin's irrational nonsense.

In fact, Heather Martin, herself should activate both sides of her brain. If she did maybe she wouldn’t be spewing such garbage on the Internet. Although I personally doubt it since I suspect this is quite intentional on her part. If she’s a psychopath she will get great pleasure not only out of smearing Kevin Annett in order to destroy his reputation but also out of making fools out of the people she’s conning and who believe her.

Her latest allegations: (don't forget to put on your Tin Foil Hats when you hop on this particular Crazy Boat folks)

Apparently Heather Martin would like us all to believe that Kevin is a ‘jesuit agent’ because someone said so on the Internet therefore it must be true.  Her ‘evidence’ for this is his ‘association’ with a guy a named Alfred Webre.

So, her argument that Kevin is a ‘jesuit agent’ is based on:
  1. A bare assertion by someone on the Internet (Karen Hudes) which actually doesn't claim that Kevin is a 'jesuit agent' so its rather deceptive of Heather Martin to claim that it does. Either that or the woman has some serious comprehension issues. Here is the actual quote: “The Jesuits are very very clever, extremely clever, they got Kevin Annett to aid the removal of Pope Benedict XVI and that was all orchestrated by the Jesuits”.
  2. A ‘guilt by association’ with someone (Alfred Webre)
  3. It (Hudes allegations as per Heather Martin's incorrect interpretation) must be true because some unrelated event is true (Talks with some Vatican reps about the Pope)
Ironically we also have a smidge of circular logic to toss into the stew pot of crazy because the allegation that Webre is a ‘jesuit agent’ is made on exactly the same premise as the allegations against Kevin. That is,
  1. A bare assertion by someone on the Internet
  2. A ‘guilt by association’ with someone (Eric Jon Phelps)
Round and round the mulberry bush we go.

Now, I have no idea who these people are. Nor do I care who they are. I’m simply trying to get a handle on some actual facts supporting the allegation that Kevin is a ‘jesuit agent’.

The arguments above summarize Heather Martin’s argument and no there is no further direct evidence that directly supports the allegation despite all the irrelevant pretty little screenshots, quotes, links to videos Heather likes to stick up on her blog and pretend are evidence and all the numerous irrelevant connections she likes to draw and call evidence. 

Here’s the problem. Either Heather Martin doesn’t know what evidence is and anyone who would accept this ‘evidence’ as meaningful also doesn’t know what evidence is.  Or, she is being intentionally deceptive, knows what she’s posting isn’t evidence but also knows that the ignorant will swallow it whole hog as long as she calls it evidence.

This would certainly explain why her numerous and publicly admitted complaints to the RCMP against Kevin Annett haven’t resulted in him being arrested for anything. It isn’t because the RCMP love him as she implies in a libelous email conversation published on another site but rather the fact that she has no actual evidence of wrong-doing, fraud or any other crime allegedly committed by Kevin Annett and her false complaints are just another one of her lame and rather irrational attempts to discredit him through libel and slander. 

This was the same conclusion that Team AnonPress, the authors of the Anonymous Report on Kevin Annett came to. Heather Martin simply isn’t credible. 

In addition, the RCMP involvement with the frame-up of Kevin Annett a few years ago would indicate that Kevin does not in fact have the inside track with the RCMP as Heather Martin alleges in what can only be described as one of her most bizarre claims. One I’m pretty sure the RCMP would probably agree is bizarre. 

One of the people involved in the frame-up offered direct first hand testimony of the RCMP involvement. The video of the ‘event’ also provided an image of the person impersonating Kevin Annett. 

Now, that is real, hard evidence. Not the bullshit Heather Martin tries to pass off as evidence.


She used the same bizarro approach of 'guilt by association' to support her allegation that Kevin Annett is anti-semitic. Of course in her bizarro brain-dead sheeple mind if one criticizes Israel then one must be anti-semitic. 

"Now, there is nothing to suggest that Kevin Annett is an Anti-Semite, unless you consider his support from Pro-Palestinian biggies like Anthony Hall, Joshua Blakeney, Alfred Webre and George Galloway." --Heather Martin

Does the brain-dead idiot, Heather Martin also consider these groups anti-semitic?
  1. Occupy Israel movement of Israelis which criticizes state treatment of the Palestinians and other policies.
  2. Orthodox Jews who disagree with zionism
  3. Non-religious Jews who believe in a secular state whether they support zionism or not.
  4. Jews who agree with zionism but disagree with the attacks on Gaza and the Settlers actions.
  5. Women in Black, started by a group of Israeli women who want peace in the ME but has now expanded world wide and is now a general pro-peace, anti-war group.
  6. Norman Finkelstein, a Jewish author and expert on the Middle East who is openly pro-Palestinian and anti-zionist and who lost his entire family during the Holocaust.
They can all be described as pro-Palestinian. Does that automatically mean that they must be anti-semitic or anti-Israeli even?

Try telling Norman Finkelstein, whose entire family was murdered at Auschwitz that he's anti-semitic and let's see how he reacts. I already know how he'd react because some Heather Martin type lunatic did that at the University of Waterloo when he spoke there and he tore them to shreds quite deservedly. 



Or how about telling these ladies that they're anti-semitic and let's see how they react to this Heather Martin type lunacy.



http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739%3ABlogPost%3A1339080

Seriously. Just how stupid does one have to be to assume that anyone who doesn't agree 100% with everything Israel does must be an anti-semitic terrorist.

It's this type of sheer ignorance that has to be squashed through intelligent discussion and presentation of real facts because this type of sheer ignorance is destructive, divisive, uncivilized and simple lays the groundwork for hate by narrow-minded bigots and terrorists on BOTH sides of the Middle East divide.

No surprise the Feds would have no interest in hiring this particular crackpot unless they’ve changed their policy in recent years and decided to throw money down the drain by hiring real crazies.

No doubt that’s a possibility. They did do that in the 1950s and 1960s. There were some seriously whacked people in the Intelligence Agencies and RCMP from the lowest to the highest levels. A few stayed for a very long time.

At any rate, whether Heather Martin is a paid Fed, a Wannabe Fed, or just a crazy bitch on the Internet with a stalker obsession for Kevin Annett, the allegations she makes are quite specious, rely on logical fallacies and reader ignorance, violate all known laws of logic and reason, and, last but not least, are the hallmark of a demagogue.

She appears to think that if she says something on the Internet everyone should just believe it because she says so. And if you don’t believe her then you’re a mindless sheeple. ROFL.

Sounds legit … Yup imma gonna run out and buy that load right now. :-D
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” --Joseph Goebbels,Hitler's Master of Propaganda. Goebbels's deeply rooted contempt for humanity, his urge to sow confusion, hatred and intoxication, his lust for power and his mastery of the techniques of mass persuasion were given full vent in the election campaigns of 1932, when he played a crucial role in bringing Hitler to the centre of the political stage. He was rewarded on 13 March 1933 with the position of Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, which gave him total control of the communications media - i.e. radio, press, publishing, cinema and the other arts. He retained this position for his lifetime. He was Hitler's right hand man until their deaths. He chose to suicide himself and poison his wife and 6 kids so as to die with Hitler. With characteristic pathos and egomania he declared not long before his death: 'We shall go down in history as the greatest statesmen of all time, or as the greatest criminals.'”
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080925001702AACvgY1

Heather Martin's new alliance with DarkNet Child Trafficking scammer, Kree Love and his RatKrew. Evidence that he was indeed operating the scam:




Evidence of the BoneYard's RatKrew Kree Love alliance with Heather Martin



No comments:

Post a Comment